Impact Statement
×
Institution
State
Region
New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station
New Hampshire
North Eastern
Title
Targeted Home Systems Remove PFAS More Cost-Effectively Than System-Wide Solutions
Relevance
{"ops":[{"insert":"PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are persistent environmental pollutants that pose significant health risks, including cancer and immune system effects. Research supported by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station underscores the financial and logistical difficulties municipalities face in addressing widespread PFAS contamination. This research is crucial for informing more effective and economically viable solutions for affected communities.\n"}]}
Response
{"ops":[{"insert":"The study co-led by Station scientist John Halstead, a professor of environmental and resource economics at UNH, analyzed the costs and efficacy of targeted home treatment systems versus system-wide solutions. The research team conducted an online study to assess New Hampshire residents' valuation of removing PFAS chemicals from public drinking water systems.\n"}]}
Results
{"ops":[{"insert":"Households expressed a willingness to pay an average of $13.07 per month for PFAS removal, aligning closely with the operational costs of home systems. The presence of moderate or major health concerns regarding tap water significantly influenced higher willingness-to-pay values. The findings indicate that targeted home systems can effectively reduce PFAS levels at a lower cost compared to municipal treatments. Even if the filters were subsidized for homeowners, this approach would reduce the financial burden on municipalities while effectively addressing localized PFAS contamination.\n"}]}
Public Value Statement
{"ops":[{"insert":"This research supports the adoption of targeted, cost-effective strategies for PFAS removal, emphasizing the practicality and economic benefits of home treatment systems for managing local contamination. These findings highlight the importance of community-level solutions in addressing complex environmental health issues.\n"}]}
Primary Focus Area
Nutrition & Health
Secondary Focus Area
Nutrition & Health
Tags
Community Development/Engagement
Human Nutrition/Health/Wellness
Water Resilience/Management
Primary Funding Source
Hatch Multistate Capacity Funds
Secondary Funding Source
None Selected
Urban Impact Statement
Yes
Submission Year
2024
Submitter is Point of Contact
Yes
Primary Contact Name
Nicholas Gosling
Primary Contact Email
nicholas.gosling@unh.edu
Integrated Impact Statement
No
Integrated With
None Selected
Statement Synopsis
New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station-supported research demonstrates that home-based PFAS removal systems are more cost-effective than municipal solutions, advocating for targeted approaches to manage local contamination efficiently and affordably.
Resource Links
https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5998
https://www.unh.edu/unhtoday/2024/07/targeted-home-systems-remove-pfas-more-cost-effective-system-wide-solutions
Copy Direct Link
Share